
then you can USUALLY manually adjust the tag values yourself. secret handshake: USUALLY you can go to the “Node” setup screen and temporarily turn off the “Enabled” checkbox. try experimenting with a few tags to get started. in SOME cases you can actually go ahead and assign your tags directly as “Device” type and use the same techniques I’ve mentioned to manually adjust the values during the development phase of your project. of course after the initial design work is done, you’ll still have to reassign your tags from “Memory” to “Device” before you put the system into operation in the field - but as long as you work systematically and carefully, that shouldn’t be too hard to do. īasic idea: whatever software you’re trying to use to “emulate” the PLC is probably going to take at least as much trouble (if not MORE) to properly simulate a series of variables as the techniques I’m recommending.

specifically, check out how the value of the tag “Automotive\Motion” is automatically incremented in the “Derived Tags” section under “Logic and Control”. įancier yet: try using the same types techniques used in the RSView “Samples” application. You can get fancier of course by using a temporary horizontal or vertical “slider” to more easily change the value. now you can manually enter any value that you desire into the tag - and check out the operation of your screen animation. just put a small (temporary) “Numeric Input” object on your window - and tie that to the TANK_LEVEL tag. Now while you’re working on your graphics, etc. instead of setting this up as a “Device” type tag, just set it up (temporarily) as a “Memory” type tag. suppose that the tag is named TANK_LEVEL. Suppose that you’re animating a display of a tank to show the liquid level rising and falling based on a numerical value in the PLC.

I’ve always had EXCELLENT results from using the following technique. why do you need either one of those packages to “test an RSView HMI” application?.

Sorry but I can’t personally help you with your “installation” problem - because I’ve never worked with either RSLogix Emulate or SoftLogix.
